Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Unknown Player vs Edison Ambarzumjan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our TBD vs Ambarzumjan analysis and find out who is favored!
Unknown Player vs Edison Ambarzumjan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: TBD 0 - 0 Ambarzumjan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), TBD has won 40.99% of points on their second serve, while Ambarzumjan has won 48.99%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show TBD, in recent form, has won 50.4% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ambarzumjan has won 50.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.06% and 31.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: TBD has saved 49.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ambarzumjan has saved 65.04% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year TBD has won 24.43% of matches played (W/L 96/ 311), with Ambarzumjan winning 56.76% (W/L 21/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: TBD has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 39% (W/L 24/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 79/ 170). Ambarzumjan has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, TBD has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 24.42% of matches (W/L 94/ 305), where as Ambarzumjan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.76% of matches (W/L 21/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, TBD has played against opponents with an average rank of 37.38 while Ambarzumjan has played against players with an average rank of 60.81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, TBD has won 49% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ambarzumjan has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, TBD has converted 40.21% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ambarzumjan has converted 38.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
0% (0-0)
Career Total W/L
51% (44-42)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
59% (16-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Unknown Player vs Edison Ambarzumjan For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For TBD VS Ambarzumjan
Sportsbook
Offer
TBD VS Ambarzumjan H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(2) 7-6(3) 16-14 |
Stats 
Unknown Player
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
112)
1
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
112)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Unknown Player | Edison Ambarzumjan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (1/2) | 59% (16/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 9% (45/458) | 61% (36/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 33% (1524/3098) | 53% (324/288) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 59% (13/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 80 | 62 |
| DFs per game | 0.08 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 185 | 41 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 31.07 | 51.11 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1937/3160) | 56% (633/1129) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (1065/1937) | 70% (445/633) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 38% (464/1223) | 49% (243/496) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (91/246) | 38% (38/99) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (1065/2996) | 38% (431/1128) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 59% (16/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (1/228) | 59% (16/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 15% (5/33) | 64% (7/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 2% (1/44) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (21/0) | 80% (20/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (21/21) | 20% (20/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (210/1) | 0% (7/0) |
Unknown Player Recent Matches Played
Before:
view more
Edison Ambarzumjan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Torres
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
70)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maik Steiner
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
68%
(
76 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
69 of
124)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
33 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
124)
126
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(7) 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Sina Moghimi
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Aaron Gil Garcia
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Luca Fantini
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Rafael Ymer
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Pablo Trochu
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Unknown Player
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
112)
1
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
112)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(2) 7-6(3) 16-14 | H2H | ||
view more
TBD Vs Ambarzumjan Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of TBD are available here and Ambarzumjan photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
